The establishment of the D/o CA is a way to get justice served to consumers. Through the BIS and NTH, the Government assures quality and through Legal Metrology Division of the Department, it assures quantity. From the Department, there is a corpus of fund under CWF to be released to voluntary consumer organisations of repute for their works on consumer protection. Even the responsibility of activating the network of justice delivery system lies on the State Governments concerned. So the very establishment is anything but 'pro-active' i.e. getting the work done
Wednesday, September 27, 2017
Monday, September 25, 2017
performance in 2016
Black Money and Unuploaded Questions - May
Indices of Admitted Questions - June
LoP for CGA - September
Indices of Admitted Questions - June
LoP for CGA - September
Wednesday, September 20, 2017
Tuesday, August 29, 2017
who would write my probation report
There was a time my probation report was mired in controversy as to who would write my probation
report for the second year
(1) Suryanarayanan
AD came to Q-Branch, E-Group on 11 July, 2016. Currently posted in Com on
Finance 9818110299, 157, PHA
(2) Arvind
Sharma AD left Q-Branch on 8 August, 2016. Currently in Coal and
Steel, JPC on Security in Parliament Complex 9968073170, 140,
PHA Flr 2
(1) He came on 7 July, 2016. There is no record in lok sabha intranet about his departure. On 4.5.2016 one of my Priority Questions was missing
from the lot. Next day was the day for completing manuscripts. I called up the
AD at extension number 5147 and asked about the question on Duty Free Shops in
Airports. He said that there was no such question with him eventhough he
remembered coming across such question.
Next day the bunch of Non-Priority question arriving from
him contained the question by Sh Sadashiv Lokhande, MP. I was saved !!!
Conclusion - the AD was not a very good one for me.
(2) I never met him, nor spoken to him. But he was AD incharge of E-Group of Question Branch, atleast for a time during intersession period. Lok Sabha intranet has no record about his coming. He departed on 8 August, 2016. On 21.7.2016 my wife was ill. I telephoned the DS that I wouldn't be able to
attend office. Next day the DS wrote that awoken him from deep sleep and my not
coming to office was termed by him as dereliction, wants explanation in
writing. AD sent the file to EO incharge, who in turn told me about the same. I
was scarred !!! In fact I was not given the chance to reply and talk about my
side of the story. Soon after he was removed from Question Branch.
Conclusion - He done the service to the Branch with good
faith. Still he was not good either.
However (1) really worked with the branch during the session
period.
Therefor (1) was the right person to see my probation report
Another AD, Ramesh Lal too had been in Q-Branch and was relieved on 21 October, 2016
Another AD, Ramesh Lal too had been in Q-Branch and was relieved on 21 October, 2016
Wednesday, August 9, 2017
Scripture bunch
And they blessed Rebekah
and said to her, "Our sister, may you increase to thousands upon
thousands; may your offspring possess the cities of their enemies."
Genesis 24:60
All my enemies whisper
together against me; they imagine the worst for me, saying, Ps 41:7
But you give us victory
over our enemies, you put our adversaries to shame. Psalms 44:7
For the director of
music. Of David. A psalm. A song. May God arise, may his enemies be scattered;
may his foes flee before him. Psslms 68:1
Don't you hear the
uproar of your enemies? Don't you see that your arrogant enemies are rising up?
Psalms 83:2
Those who hate me without reason outnumber the
hairs of my head; many are my enemies without cause, those who seek to destroy
me. I am forced to restore what I did not steal.
Psalms 69:41:7
Presentation. Note to HS, as revised by JS, resubmitted
Entry Formula plus authenticated copies of 17th report submitted
JS's query resolved again and resubmitted
Draft Chapter I, Memo and appendix II relating to ATR on 16th report given for typing
Thursday, August 3, 2017
Poor show
Presentation and Reply profile of the Reports of the Standing Committee on Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution
Sr. No.
|
Report
|
Date of Presentation
|
Date of furnishing of Action Taken Notes
|
Gap between Presentation and Action Taken
|
1.
|
18th Report on DFG (2012-13)
|
30 May, 2012
|
24 July, 2012
|
1 month and 23 days
|
2.
|
29th Report on DFG (2013-14)
|
30 April, 2013
|
29 July, 2013
|
2 months and 29 days
|
3.
|
2nd Report on DFG (2014-15)
|
22 December, 2014
|
17 April, 2015
|
3 months and 26 days
|
4.
|
4th Report on DFG (2015-16)
|
27 April, 2015
|
10 August, 2015
|
4 months and 17 days
|
5.
|
11th Report on DFG (2016-17)
|
3 May, 2016
|
10 August, 2016
|
3 months and 7 days
|
6.
|
16th Report on DFG (2017-18)
|
20 March, 2017
|
02 August, 2017
|
4 months and 13 days-
|
The Committee has observed that the Department's promptness in reacting to the reports of the Committee has declined over time. For Example the Committee's 18th Report on DFG (2012-13), was presented on 30 May, 2012. The Department took hardly 2 months to furnish their reply to the recommendations of the report. On the other hand, reply to the 16th Report on DFG(2017-18) of the Department, presented on 20 March, 2017 was furnished on 2 August, 2017 ie 4 months and 13 days later, thus showing staggering inefficiency.
Thursday, July 13, 2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)